The samples are from a Yamaha C5 6’7″ Grand Piano.

On my Ravenscroft the A in the 3rd octave sounds much louder than any other key. Ravenscroft 275 vst is pretty sick, can get great sounds out of it, great velocity controls and lots of options for piano timbre. From a sound perspective the CFX is sublime. The Boesendorfer in Motion Symphonic Instruments is a beautiful grand sample. comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a. Garritan CFX gets lots of plaudits, seems more controllable with pedalling etc than some vst pianos too. With excellent sounds, not less than 16 layers of velocity, key release samples, etc. Garritan CFX (199) Ravenscroft 275 (199) Which piano VST do you think is better Thanks in advance. Garritan is technically superb with great playability, but I find the sound of the piano itself somewhat sterile and the overall experience strangely unsatisfying. a free piano which is Grand Piano XXL Free from Audiolatry. They have their pluses and minuses, but I would say that your initial impressions re: Garritan and Ravenscroft are pretty accurate. You can detune it to create presets of old detuned pianobar instruments with altered sounds, etc.īut sometimes I also use. Garritan CFX (199) Ravenscroft 275 (199) Which piano VST do you think is better Thanks in advance. You can totally transform the sound if you want to make modern things with a piano. And it features lots of built-in effects. And Pianoteq building the sound instead of using samples it comes with 256 layers of velocity, a 3 piano-pedalboard emulation, and many features, even in the cheap Stage Edition. plus about 20 other models of acoustic and electric pianos to add that you can choose for not expensive in comparison to their quality). Pianoteq is by far my preferred piano, with all the models it can embeds (2 by defaults (included in the paid VST) plus a dozen of free pianos, pianofortes, harpsichords, bells, etc.

Garritan cfx vs ravenscroft 275